Legal language and power: a critical discourse analysis of anti-corruption laws in Indonesia

Dani Setiaji

doi:10.67490/ijll.v1i1.525

Authors

Dani Setiaji Universitas Trunojoyo Madura Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67490/ijll.v1i1.525

Keywords:

anti-corruption law, critical discourse analysis, legal language, modality, semiotics

Abstract

Background: Corruption in Indonesia remains a persistent challenge, and the Anti-Corruption Law (UU Tipikor) has long been criticized for embedding state-centered framings and ambiguous provisions that complicate consistent enforcement. Objective: The purpose of this study is to critically examine how the language of anti-corruption law constructs ideological authority and distributes institutional power. Method: Using a qualitative design, this research integrates Critical Discourse Analysis, legal semiotics, and modality pragmatics to analyze statutes, regulations, judicial decisions, and institutional documents as a comprehensive corpus. Results: The findings reveal three central patterns: first, ideological framings foreground kerugian negara (state losses) and kepentingan umum (public interest) while marginalizing direct reference to citizens; second, key terms such as penyelenggara negara, gratifikasi, and patut diduga demonstrate symbolic ambiguity that sustains state authority yet undermines legal certainty; third, the predominance of discretionary modality (dapat) over obligatory terms (wajib, harus) illustrates how linguistic structures empower enforcement bodies while weakening mandatory accountability. Implication: The implication is that reform efforts must address not only institutional design but also the ideological framing and linguistic construction embedded within legal texts. Novelty: This study interrogates how the linguistic and semiotic construction of anti-corruption law in Indonesia sustains institutional authority while embedding ambiguity that shapes power distribution and enforcement practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] T. N. M. Nhat and H. T. T. Hien, “Construction of roles, obligations and values in politicians’ discourses on anti-corruption,” Cogent Arts & Humanities, vol. 10, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2023.2249286.

[2] I. A. Brown and M. T. T. Thai, “The proliferation of neoliberal ideology: A study of international anti-corruption discourse through the lens of institutional entrepreneurship theory,” Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.24294/jipd.v8i8.4295.

[3] F. Arifin, “Reform and Simplification of Legislative Regulations in Indonesia,” Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.55908/sdgs.v11i11.2262.

[4] Z. Qathrunnada, C. Nugroho, F. Yusanto, A. Wulandari, and R. R. Wulan, “Ideology, resistance, and sociopolitical dynamics in Indonesia: media narratives and resistance discourses on the chairman of the corruption eradication commission’s corruption case,” Frontiers in Communication, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2025.1552110.

[5] Z. Ammar and M. Mas’adi, “Pertamina Systemic Corruption: Van Dijk`s Critical Discourse Analysis on Indonesia Al-Youm`s Reporting,” Journal of Language and Literature Studies, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.36312/jolls.v5i2.2816.

[6] T. Pawe, L. Husen, and Abd. K. Muzakkir, “The Paradox of a Rule of Law State: A Critical Reflection on the Dialectic between Discourse and Reality in the Eradication of Corruption in Indonesia,” Sovereign: International Journal of Law, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.37276/sijl.v7i1-2.56.

[7] P. Yudi and B. Berlian, “Legal Analysis Of Corruption And Social Change,” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Mamangan, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.22202/mamangan.v12i3.6420.

[8] N. Fairclough, Media discourse. Edward Arnold London, 1995. [Online]. Available: https://reviewbooku.com/review/norman-fairclough-media-discourse-4951969

[9] R. Wodak, The Discourse of Politics in Action. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2009. doi: 10.1057/9780230316539.

[10] T. A. Van Dijk, “Introduction: discourse, interaction and cognition,” Discourse Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 5–7, Feb. 2006, doi: 10.1177/1461445606059544.

[11] T. van Leeuwen, “New forms of writing, new visual competencies,” Visual Studies, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 130–135, 2008, doi: 10.1080/14725860802276263.

[12] N. Stratulat, “Features of the functioning of leksem ‘corruption’, ‘corruptive’, ‘anti-corruption’ in modern ukrainian legislation,” Ukrainian Linguistics, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.17721/um/52(2022).19-31.

[13] S. Sunaryo and A. I. Nur, “Legal Policy of Anti-Corruption Supervisor Design: A New Anti-Corruption Model in Indonesia,” BESTUUR, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.20961/bestuur.v10i2.65105.

[14] L. T. Feikema, “Anti-corruption Law as a Fiction: The Illusion of Serving Morality by Controlling It through Rules and Regulations with an International Reach,” Global Perspectives, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1525/gp.2024.115472.

[15] V. Naxera and P. Krčál, “Ideological Discourses of Anti-Corruption in the Czech Way: Similarities and Discrepancies Between Parties, Governments, and Official Anti-Corruption Strategies,” Public Integrity, vol. 27, pp. 685–700, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1080/10999922.2024.2448873.

[16] Yu. Shatin and I. Silantev, “Russian Judicial Discourse in the Light of the Modern Theory of Argumentation,” Critique and Semiotics, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.25205/2307-1737-2020-2-401-412.

[17] J. Behuku, J. I. Kusuma, N. U. Chasanah, F. Sugianto, and A. A. Indradewi, “The Judge’s Role in the Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Enforcement in Indonesia: A Juridical Analysis,” SIGn Jurnal Hukum, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.37276/sjh.v7i1.464.

[18] T. Karimova, “Features of linguistic expertise of texts of dialogues on anti-corruption cases,” Полицейская деятельность, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.7256/2454-0692.2024.1.69818.

[19] Y. Liu, “Multimodal construction of ‘rule of law’ in Chinese anti-corruption public service advertisements: a social semiotic approach,” International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1558/ijsll.38611.

[20] C. Yuan, Y. He, and Y. Liu, “Rule by law versus rule of law: A multimodal analysis of persuasion and legal ideologies in anti-corruption discourse in China,” Multimodality & Society, vol. 1, pp. 429–454, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1177/26349795211060751.

[21] D. Griffin and D. Roemling, “Signs of Legal and Pseudolegal Authority: A Corpus-Based Comparison of Contemporary Courtroom Filings,” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, vol. 38, pp. 1397–1432, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11196-024-10183-7.

[22] J. W. Creswell, Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methode Approach, (Research Design, Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed, Edisi Ketiga) terj. Achmad Fawaid. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://digilib.ub.ac.id/opac/detail-opac?id=139455

[23] R. Bameri, A. Mojavezi, and H. Vaezi, “Discourse Analysis of Judges and Defendants in Iranian Criminal Courts Based on Halliday and Matthiessen’s Systemic Functional Linguistics,” Legal Studies in Digital Age, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.61838/kman.lsda.239.

[24] G. Kress and T. Van Leeuwen, “Modality and validity,” in Reading Images, 3rd ed., Third edition. | London; New York: Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2020, pp. 149–178. doi: 10.4324/9781003099857-6.

[25] R. Jayuska, I. G. A. K. R. Handayani, I. Isharyanto, I. Marzuki, and A. Fawaid, “The Ambiguous Authority of Provincial Governors in Customary Law Recognition: Regulatory Fragmentation in Indonesia’s Decentralization Era,” Khazanah Hukum, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 276–294, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.15575/kh.v7i2.46367.

[26] H. Sugianto, A. Fawaid, and H. Baharun, “Islamic Law And Gendered Inheritance: An-Taradhin as Breakthrough for Women’s Rights Disputes in Java, Bali, and Sumatra,” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 700–731, 2025, doi: 10.29240/jhi.v10i2.12614.

[27] D. Hayamanysah, S. Suseno, and E. Gultom, “Strengthening Legal Enforcement in the Indonesian Insurance Sector: Regulatory Gaps and Policy Reform Agenda,” PRAWO i WIĘŹ, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.36128/priw.vi55.1244.