Whose testimony is believed? linguistic credibility, gendered narratives, and institutional power in Indonesian sexual violence judgments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67490/ijll.v1i2.922Keywords:
forensic linguistics, gendered narratives, institutional power, sexual violence judgments, testimonial credibilityAbstract
Background: Sexual violence adjudication in Indonesia increasingly depends not only on legal proof, but also on how courts linguistically construct whose testimony becomes believable, doubtful, admissible, or insufficient. Objective: This study examines how linguistic credibility, gendered narrative positioning, and institutional power are textualised in Indonesian sexual violence judgments. Method: Using a qualitative legal discourse design, this study analyses 11 judgment-related text units drawn from a public corpus of court judgments and judgment-linked legal documents, combining forensic linguistic analysis, feminist legal theory, and critical discourse analysis. Results: The findings show that credibility is produced through judicial revoicing, evidentiary sequencing, corroborative uptake, procedural framing, and legal thresholding. Victim testimony is often made persuasive when attached to recognised signs of vulnerability, medical or psychological corroboration, object evidence, or institutional validation, while disbelief is expressed through explicit judicial formulations of doubt and insufficiency. Implication: Institutional power operates by ranking victim testimony, defendant denial, witness statements, expert reports, documentary proof, and statutory elements within a hierarchy of legal intelligibility. Novelty: This study contributes a discourse-based account of testimonial belief in Indonesian sexual violence adjudication by shifting attention from whether testimony is accepted to how credibility is linguistically and institutionally made possible.
Downloads
References
[1] V. Denault and V. Talwar, “The use of demeanour to assess the credibility of child victims in sexual interference trials,” Child Abuse Review, 2024, doi: 10.1002/car.2885.
[2] V. Badino, L. Milani, and S. Miragoli, “Narrative completeness and investigation relevant information in child sexual abuse,” Legal and Criminological Psychology, 2025, doi: 10.1111/lcrp.70022.
[3] B. Verschuere, B. Kleinberg, M. Van Kolfschooten, L. Bolhoven, and E. Rassin, “How Dutch legal professionals assess statement credibility: Evidence from a survey and an analysis of 518 court rulings on sexual abuse,” Memory, 1–10, 2025, doi: 10.1080/09658211.2025.2592947.
[4] S. Ailwood, “The violence of judgment: Judging, credibility and victim-witnesses of sexual violence in civil justice,” Legalities, 2025, doi: 10.3366/legal.2025.0104.
[5] S. Mariano, “The “double bind” of gender-based violence: Secondary victimization in courtroom cross-examinations,” Behavioral Sciences & the Law, vol. 44, pp. 96–108, 2025, doi: 10.1002/bsl.70025.
[6] A. Stepnitz, “Believing asylum-seeking women: Doing gender in legal narratives of sexual and gender-based violence,” Social & Legal Studies, vol. 32, pp. 776–799, 2023, doi: 10.1177/09646639221140907.
[7] J. Bublitz, “When is disbelief epistemic injustice? Criminal procedure, recovered memories, and deformations of the epistemic subject,” Criminal Law and Philosophy, 1–28, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11572-023-09695-3.
[8] E. Habba, R. Keydar, D. Bareket, and G. Stanovsky, “The perfect victim: Computational analysis of judicial attitudes towards victims of sexual violence,” In Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2023, doi: 10.1145/3594536.3595168.
[9] H. Williams and A. Jobe, “Testimonial injustice: Exploring “credibility” as a barrier to justice for people with learning disabilities/autism who report sexual violence,” Disability & Society, vol. 40, pp. 1061–1083, 2024, doi: 10.1080/09687599.2024.2323455.
[10] M. Maswandi, J. Jamillah, and A. Sitompul, “The power of proof in victims of sexual abuse,” SASI, 2022, doi: 10.47268/sasi.v28i3.988.
[11] H. Mardikantoro, I. Baehaqie, and M. B. Siroj, “Construction of women in media: A critical discourse analysis on violence against women in newspaper,” Cogent Arts & Humanities, vol. 9, 2022, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2022.2146927.
[12] A. Mardhiah, E. Susilo, and D. Negara, “The arrangement unus testis nullus testis in sexual violence crime cases: Crucial or over-regulation?,” Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 2025, doi: 10.30659/jdh.v8i1.44613.
[13] T. C. Silva, “Assessment of credibility of testimony in alleged intimate partner violence: A case report,” Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, vol. 22, pp. 58–86, 2021, doi: 10.1080/24732850.2021.1945836.
[14] M. Cabezas-García, M. E. De La Peña Fernández, and J. M. A. Rodríguez, “Factores psicosociales asociados a la credibilidad del testimonio en abuso sexual infantil,” Anales de Psicología, 2022, doi: 10.6018/analesps.418161.
[15] M. Yi, E.-B. Kim, K.-M. Kim, M. Park, and J. Han, “Judicial reasoning in credibility assessments of child victim testimonies: An analysis of court rulings in sexual abuse cases,” Korean Association of Victimology, 2025, doi: 10.36220/kjv.2025.33.1.123.
[16] J. Goodman-Delahunty, N. Martschuk, E. Lee, and A. Cossins, “Greater knowledge enhances complainant credibility and increases jury convictions for child sexual assault,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 12, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624331.
[17] N. Sumampouw, C. De Ruiter, and H. Otgaar, “Potential for police investigator bias: The impact of child sexual abuse victims’ background characteristics on perceived statement credibility, case outcome and quality of interview questions,” Police Practice and Research, vol. 23, pp. 370–387, 2021, doi: 10.1080/15614263.2021.1952872.
[18] M. Ansori, “Speech act strategies in police interrogation transcripts: Evidence from Bahasa Indonesia investigative records,” Indonesian Journal of Linguistics and Legal Discourse, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 2026.
[19] W. B. M. Setiyawan, “Forensic linguistic evidence in Indonesian courtrooms: A study of language use in criminal verdicts,” Indonesian Journal of Linguistics and Legal Discourse, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2026.
[20] B. Pereira, O. Cunha, A. R. Cruz, R. Gonçalves, and A. De Castro-Rodrigues, “Child sexual abuse: How is the victim represented in Portuguese sentences,” Victims & Offenders, 2022, doi: 10.1080/15564886.2022.2053255.
[21] C. Knowles, “Articulating understanding: A phenomenological approach to testimony on gendered violence,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies, vol. 29, pp. 448–470, 2021, doi: 10.1080/09672559.2021.1997389.
[22] S. Wallace, “In defence of not-knowing: Uncertainty and contemporary narratives of sexual violence,” Feminist Theory, vol. 22, pp. 536–555, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1464700120987387.
[23] P. P. Manjón, “Challenging discourses of sexual violence on X: The linguistic representation of victims and perpetrators in Kavanaugh’s confirmation process,” Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 2024, doi: 10.14198/raei.2024.41.05.
[24] S. Supriyanto, “Victim blaming in sexual harassment cases: A critique of societal views,” International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 2023, doi: 10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i6-65.
[25] N. Musyafak, N. Khasanah, and U. Marfu’ah, “Unveiling biases in Indonesia’s online media: Analyzing sexual violence reporting in the modern era through a feminist lens,” Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2025, doi: 10.47836/pjssh.33.1.12.
[26] I. H. Hamzah and G. D. Yuliana, “Gender sensitive journalism in Harian Kompas as a media advocacy against women’s sexual violence,” LONTAR: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 2023, doi: 10.30656/lontar.v11i1.6194.
[27] Z. A. Mz, A. Saifullah, and Y. Wirza, “From newsroom frames to courtroom registers: Language as patriarchal legitimation in sexual violence reporting,” Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya, 2025, doi: 10.26714/lensa.15.2.2025.242-260.
[28] D. Setiaji, “Legal language and power: A critical discourse analysis of anti-corruption laws in Indonesia,” Indonesian Journal of Linguistics and Legal Discourse, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2026.
[29] Sadani, “Linguistic construction of justice: A pragmatic analysis of judges’ reasoning in Indonesian constitutional court decisions,” Indonesian Journal of Linguistics and Legal Discourse, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 2026.
[30] G. M. P. Swardhyana and A. Irawan, “Evidence in sexual violence crime cases,” International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, 2022, doi: 10.51601/ijersc.v3i5.491.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ghania Maham (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License