From sacred landscape to visual commodity: the platformization of cultural space in Indonesian tourism media

Umma Fathimah Sabilah Faradis

doi:10.67490/ijls.v1i2.898

Authors

Umma Fathimah Sabilah Faradis Universitas PGRI Sumenep Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67490/ijls.v1i2.898

Keywords:

cultural landscapes, heritage tourism, multimodal discourse, platformization, tourism imaginaries

Abstract

Background: The increasing dependence of tourism promotion on digital platforms has transformed how sacred and culturally significant landscapes are represented, circulated, and consumed within contemporary tourism communication. Objective: This study examines how Indonesian tourism media platformize cultural space and reconfigure sacred landscapes into visually consumable tourism commodities. Method: This study employs a qualitative corpus-based multimodal design using official tourism and heritage communication materials, combining platformization mapping, sacred-to-commodity framing analysis, and multimodal-spatial analysis. Results: Findings indicate that cultural landscapes are systematically organized through platform visibility mechanisms that prioritize discoverability, visual attractiveness, and destination branding. Findings further reveal that sacred and heritage meanings are not removed but selectively rearticulated through experience-oriented narratives emphasizing immersion, accessibility, and tourism engagement. Findings also demonstrate that multimodal resources, including visual framing, spatial composition, symbolic imagery, and textual narratives, construct a tourist gaze that privileges scenic appreciation and destination recognition while maintaining limited references to ritual and cultural significance. Implication: The novelty of this study lies in integrating cultural landscape theory, tourism imaginaries, and platformization perspectives within a unified analytical framework that explains how sacred space is transformed through digital tourism media. Novelty: This study contributes to tourism communication, heritage studies, and multimodal discourse research by advancing a platform-oriented understanding of cultural representation in contemporary tourism environments.

References

[1] A. Aliyah, R. A. Kartini, A. Amanda, and T. T. D. Sartika, “Stimulating tourists' imagination: The role of visual communication in managing storynomic tourism strategies in the digital age,” Global Insights in Management and Economic Research, 2025, doi: 10.53905/gimer.v1i02.8.

[2] D. Devylia, “An analysis of the effectiveness of social media as a promotional tool for Perlang Tourism Village,” Indonesian Tourism Journal, 2025, doi: 10.69812/itj.v2i1.109.

[3] M. Jia, J. Chen, Y. Chen, Y. Ge, L. Zheng, and S. Yang, “Coupling relationship between tourists’ space perception and tourism image in Nanxun Ancient Town based on social media data visualization,” Buildings, vol. 15, no. 9, p. 1465, 2025, doi: 10.3390/buildings15091465.

[4] M. S. Harahap, R. Khadafi, E. J. Hasibuan, A. Saputra, S. Hardiyanto, and F. Lubis, “Social media and optimization of the promotion of Lake Toba tourism destinations in Indonesia,” Computer Science and Information Technologies, 2023, doi: 10.11591/csit.v4i3.p208-216.

[5] Z. Wang and L. Marafa, “Tourism imaginary and landscape at heritage site: A case in Honghe Hani Rice Terraces, China,” Land, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 439, 2021, doi: 10.3390/land10040439.

[6] M. Wang, P. Li, X. Xiao, H. Zhang, J. Lu, Xu, and Y.-H., “Tourists’ visual attention to cultural landscapes under crowding stimuli: An eye-tracking approach,” Journal of Vacation Marketing, vol. 32, pp. 168–185, 2024, doi: 10.1177/13567667241268918.

[7] B. Sukma, “Constructing and promoting national identity through tourism: A multimodal discourse analysis of Indonesian official tourism website,” Linguistik Indonesia, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 63–77, 2021, doi: 10.26499/li.v39i1.197.

[8] R. R. Ristiawan and W. Sushartami, “Political reconciliation and emancipatory reinterpretations of Jakarta’s Pancasila Sakti Monument through heritage tourism: An exploratory study,” International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol. 32, pp. 215–232, 2026, doi: 10.1080/13527258.2025.2557831.

[9] L. Santyaputri, “Film tourism and transmedia storytelling: Exploring Yogyakarta’s heritage,” APLIKATIF: Journal of Research Trends in Social Sciences and Humanities, 2025, doi: 10.59110/aplikatif.v4i2.643.

[10] T. Terkenli, “Landscapes of tourism in the era of a new cultural economy of space: A reformulated analytical framework,” Annals of the American Association of Geographers, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 725–741, 2025, doi: 10.1080/24694452.2024.2447508.

[11] J. Zhang, X. Liu, Z. Feng, and X. Feng, “Research on the influencing factors of art intervention in the environmental graphics of rural cultural tourism space,” Land, vol. 13, no. 10, 2024, doi: 10.3390/land13101680.

[12] P. Hidayat, “Spatial framing in tourism advertising: The linguistic construction of exoticism in Indonesian destination campaigns,” Indonesian Journal of Language, Space, and Visual Arts, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 2026.

[13] D. Sartono, “Visual discourse of urban space: A semiotic analysis of street art and linguistic graffiti in Jakarta,” Indonesian Journal of Language, Space, and Visual Arts, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2026.

[14] H. Aini, “Visualizing identity: Linguistic landscapes and ethnolinguistic signage in Indonesian multicultural neighborhoods,” Indonesian Journal of Language, Space, and Visual Arts, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 2026.

[15] P. A. Andini, “Multimodal representation of environmental messages in Indonesian eco-murals,” Indonesian Journal of Language, Space, and Visual Arts, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2026.

[16] Daroji., “Architectural narratives and spatial language: A discourse study of traditional house descriptions in Indonesia,” Indonesian Journal of Language, Space, and Visual Arts, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2026.

[17] R. Pahlawan, “Language of typography in political posters: Visual rhetoric in Indonesian electoral design,” Indonesian Journal of Language, Space, and Visual Arts, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 41–50, 2026.

[18] T. Panjaitan, D. Pojani, and S. Darchen, “The transformation of public space production and consumption in post-reformation Indonesian cities,” City, Culture and Society, vol. 31, p. 100444, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ccs.2022.100444.

[19] K. McClymont, “The fall of statues? Contested heritage, public space and urban planning,” Planning Theory & Practice, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 767–795, 2021, doi: 10.1080/14649357.2021.1995255.

[20] D. A. Jelinčić and J. K. Reap, “Contested heritage or cancel culture? The case of Ivan Meštrović’s public sculptures in Chicago,” Heritage, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 2194–2209, 2022, doi: 10.3390/heritage5030142.

[21] U. Schaper and D. Lerp, “Layers of memory: Monuments, memorials and the (de)colonisation of public space in Germany,” Journal of Modern European History, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 357–377, 2025, doi: 10.1177/16118944251348775.

[22] B. Williamson, “Historical geographies of place naming: Colonial practices and beyond,” Geography Compass, vol. 17, no. 5, 2023, doi: 10.1111/gec3.12687.

[23] N. N. Benu, B. A. Sudarmanto, T. Wahyuni, D. Susilastri, E. Rosita, A. Mahmud, and S. Yono, “The culinary linguistic landscape of Kupang City, Indonesia: Unraveling identity through sign boards,” Cogent Arts & Humanities, vol. 12, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2025.2449735.

[24] K. W. Purnawati, K. Artawa, M. S. Satyawati, and I. Kardana, “Unveiling communication strategies through public space signs: A linguistic landscape study in Badung Smart Heritage Market, Bali-Indonesia,” Cogent Arts & Humanities, vol. 12, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2444045.

[25] S. L. Ding, “Collective memory and identity of a rebranded ‘Chinatown’,” International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1265–1281, 2023, doi: 10.1080/13527258.2023.2244921.