Discourse of economic inequality in Indonesian news media: a sociolinguistic perspective

Ainul Hadziqi

doi:10.67490/ijle.v1i1.523

Authors

Ainul Hadziqi Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67490/ijle.v1i1.523

Keywords:

critical discourse analysis, economic inequality, framing, Indonesian media, sociolinguistics

Abstract

Background: Economic inequality remains one of Indonesia’s most pressing socio-economic challenges, yet its representation in news media has rarely been examined through a sociolinguistic lens. Objective: The objective of this study is to analyze how Indonesian online news media discursively construct inequality, how linguistic variation reflects social stratification, and how framing strategies shape causal attributions and proposed solutions. Method: Methodologically, this research applies a qualitative design by combining Critical Discourse Analysis, Sociolinguistic Analysis, and Framing Analysis to a purposive corpus of 55 online articles from 2022 to 2024. Results: The results show three key findings: first, news texts tend to legitimize inequality by individualizing poverty and externalizing causes through references to global crises; second, lexical stratification marks elite actors with technical jargon while grassroots voices are reduced to emotive anecdotes; third, framing emphasizes state-centered solutions such as subsidies and welfare while marginalizing community-based alternatives like cooperatives. Implication: The implication of this study is that Indonesian news media not only mirror but also filter public discourse on inequality, privileging elite narratives while limiting democratic deliberation on structural reforms. Novelty: This study uncovers how Indonesian news media linguistically construct and frame economic inequality in ways that legitimize dominant perspectives while constraining alternative narratives of structural change.

References

[1] Z. Ammar and M. Mas’adi, “Pertamina Systemic Corruption: Van Dijk`s Critical Discourse Analysis on Indonesia Al-Youm`s Reporting,” Journal of Language and Literature Studies, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.36312/jolls.v5i2.2816.

[2] N. D. P. Nasution, N. Naila, S. F. Siagian, and S. F. Dalimunthe, “Analisis Wacana Kritis terhadap Tagline ‘Indonesia Gelap’ dalam Berita Detik.com,” MUKASI: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, May 2025, doi: 10.54259/mukasi.v4i2.4176.

[3] F. Lukman, R. Nasrullah, D. Suganda, R. Dienaputra, and E.-S. E.-S. A. A. Rahim, “Language and Power in Media as Terminological Deformation of Radicalism in Indonesia: A Critical Discourse Analysis,” Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.35516/hum.v52i6.7661.

[4] A. Adiwinata, “Critical Discourse Analysis of the Internationalization of Bahasa Indonesia in Online News: Norman Fairlough’s Description Approach,” Journal of Literature and Education, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.69815/jle.v3i1.142.

[5] I. D. Veronika and A. Degaf, “Anti-vaccine COVID-19 narratives: A critical textual analysis of American and Indonesian online news,” Studies in English Language and Education, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.24815/siele.v11i3.37380.

[6] N. Fairclough, Media discourse. Edward Arnold London, 1995. [Online]. Available: https://reviewbooku.com/review/norman-fairclough-media-discourse-4951969

[7] T. A. Van Dijk, “Introduction: discourse, interaction and cognition,” Discourse Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 5–7, Feb. 2006, doi: 10.1177/1461445606059544.

[8] M. Sulhan, “Ethics violations discourse of the Constitutional Court in Indonesian online media,” Jurnal Studi Komunikasi (Indonesian Journal of Communications Studies), Mar. 2025, doi: 10.25139/jsk.v9i1.9274.

[9] T. Arkida, F. Anekawati, and W. Rais, “Linguistic Reflections of Cultural Ethics: Social Assistance Discourse in Surakarta,” Journal of Pragmatics Research, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.18326/jopr.v7i1.86-106.

[10] R. Wodak, The Discourse of Politics in Action. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2009. doi: 10.1057/9780230316539.

[11] J. Wang and Z. Liang, “Indexical order and language ideology in the linguistic landscape of tourism in Hong Kong: Chungking Mansions and its surroundings,” Chinese Semiotic Studies, vol. 20, pp. 273–295, May 2024, doi: 10.1515/css-2024-2019.

[12] A. Rakhmawati and N. A. Gumelar, “Unmasking the frenetic guise of infidelity case among Indonesian artists on CNN news media: Critical discourse analysis,” Journal of Applied Studies in Language, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.31940/jasl.v8i2.171-183.

[13] A. Dilfuza, “Sociolinguistic Study of Discursive Markers,” European International Journal of Philological Sciences, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.55640/eijps-05-04-02.

[14] M. Vaughan, H. Theine, D. Schieferdecker, and N. Waitkus, “Communication about economic inequality: a systematic review,” Annals of the International Communication Association, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1093/anncom/wlaf006.

[15] D. R. Nurmiati, B. Rusyidi, and B. M. Taftazani, “Media Framing of Gender in the Cianjur 2022 Earthquake: A Social Work Perspective,” INJECT (Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication), Jul. 2025, doi: 10.18326/inject.v10i1.4532.

[16] A. Fawaid and P. Handayani, “Visualizing inequality: uncovering gender bias in Islamic textbooks of Indonesia,” Cogent Education, vol. 12, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2025.2593342.

[17] A. Mukti, N. Hidayat, and K. Kushandajani, “Media Framing and Audience Reactions to the 3-Kg LPG Restriction: A Youtube Comment Analysis of Metro TV’s ‘Putus Distribusi “Gas Melon” Di Pengecer,’” International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, May 2025, doi: 10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i5-53.

[18] M. Boukes, “Episodic and Thematic Framing Effects on the Attribution of Responsibility: The Effects of Personalized and Contextualized News on Perceptions of Individual and Political Responsibility for Causing the Economic Crisis,” The International Journal of Press/Politics, vol. 27, pp. 374–395, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1177/1940161220985241.

[19] A. Z. Munibi, “Language as a Catalyst for Shaping Religious Identity and Political Ideology in the Era of Social Media,” Jurnal Multidisiplin West Science, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.58812/jmws.v4i07.2439.

[20] J. W. Creswell, Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methode Approach, (Research Design, Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed, Edisi Ketiga) terj. Achmad Fawaid. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://digilib.ub.ac.id/opac/detail-opac?id=139455

[21] A. Fawaid, M. Huda, and H. bin Jali, “Politics of Representation in Indonesian Textbooks: The Impacts of Educational Narrative Reforms on the Formation of National Identity in Post-Reform Era,” Paedagoria: Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan Kependidikan, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 23–33, 2026, doi: 10.31764/paedagoria.v17i1.35750.

[22] T. D. Jick, “Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action,” Administrative science quarterly, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 602–611, 1979.

[23] S. Wahyuni, “Analisis Wacana Kritis Pada Meme Politik Terkait Wacana Kenaikan Pajak Yang Mencekik di Media Sosial,” Linguistik, Terjemahan, Sastra (LINGTERSA), Aug. 2025, doi: 10.32734/lts.v6i2.20875.

[24] H. I. Wahyuni, K. K. Yuliarso, A. W. Sukarno, and W. P. Utomo, “Public communication in the time of pandemic: Lessons from Indonesia,” SEARCH Journal of Media and Communication Research, vol. 2021, no. Special Issue, pp. 97–109, 2021.

[25] C. Burgers, E. A. Konijn, and G. J. Steen, “Figurative Framing: Shaping Public Discourse Through Metaphor, Hyperbole, and Irony,” Communication Theory, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 410–430, 2016, doi: 10.1111/comt.12096.

[26] B. Wei, “Reframing judicial proof: Insights from dialectical argumentation theory,” The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, vol. 29, pp. 289–307, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1177/13657127251324033.

[27] G. Urbaite, “Linguistic Landscapes: How Urban Environments Shape Language Variation,” Porta Universorum, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.69760/portuni.010203.