Whose city is visible? linguistic inequality and spatial belonging in the multilingual landscapes of Indonesian metropolitan peripheries

Zohaib Hassan Sain; Ridhatullah Assya’bani

doi:10.67490/ijls.v1i2.894

Authors

Zohaib Hassan Sain Superior University Author
Ridhatullah Assya’bani Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Al-Qur'an Amuntai Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67490/ijls.v1i2.894

Keywords:

linguistic landscape, linguistic inequality, metropolitan peripheries, spatial belonging, urban multilingualism

Abstract

Background: Metropolitan peripheries concentrate industrial expansion, commuter mobility, administrative growth, and local identity, yet their multilingual public spaces remain unevenly recognised. Objective: This study examines how linguistic visibility, sign-producing authority, and spatial belonging are organised across Kabupaten Bekasi, Kabupaten Sidoarjo, and Kabupaten Bandung. Method: Using a multi-sited linguistic-landscape design, this study analyses 371 coded signs through a Stratified Linguistic Visibility Matrix, a Sign-Authority and Access Grid, and a Spatial Belonging and Place-Making Protocol. Results: Indonesian dominated governmental and transport domains, while English gained prominence in industrial and commercial settings. Local languages appeared most functionally in heritage, neighbourhood, and selected civic or commercial spaces, with Sundanese receiving broader cross-domain visibility in Kabupaten Bandung than local-language resources in Bekasi and Sidoarjo. Sign authorship further differentiated visibility: governmental and corporate actors controlled durable and consequential signage, whereas community-produced local-language displays were more frequently temporary or spatially restricted. Implication: This study’s implication lies in conceptualising linguistic inequality as unequal access to consequential spatial visibility rather than unequal frequency alone. Novelty: By integrating language salience, institutional authority, sign permanence, domain, and semiotic constructions of belonging, this study offers a relational framework for explaining how metropolitan peripheries recognise some linguistic communities while confining others to symbolic cultural presence within changing urban landscapes

References

[1] D. Gorter, “Multilingual inequality in public spaces: Towards an inclusive model of Linguistic Landscapes,” Multilingualism in Public Spaces, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.5040/9781350186620.ch-001.

[2] P. Nie, J. Yao, and N. Tashi, “Mapping the linguistic landscape from a multi-factor perspective: the case of a multi-ethnolinguistic city in China,” International Journal of Multilingualism, vol. 20, pp. 231–249, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1080/14790718.2021.1898620.

[3] P. Lam, “A multi‐sited analysis of the linguistic landscape of Hong Kong through a center‐periphery approach,” World Englishes, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1111/weng.12625.

[4] S.-Y. Hong, Y. Kim, and Y.-H. Lee, “Ethnic segregation on linguistic landscapes,” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, vol. 50, pp. 1916–1931, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1177/23998083221150240.

[5] T.-S. Kim and J.-S. Ahn, “Celebrating local heritage while marginalizing local language: the multilingual linguistic landscapes of Seongsu-dong in Seoul,” International Journal of Multilingualism, vol. 22, pp. 517–535, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1080/14790718.2023.2260423.

[6] N. Benu, K. Artawa, K. W. Purnawati, K. Widya, and Purnawati, “Local language vitality in Kupang city, Indonesia: A linguistic landscape approach,” Cogent Arts & Humanities, vol. 10, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2022.2153973.

[7] Y. Mubarok, D. Sudana, Z. Nurhuda, and D. Yanti, “Linguistic Landscape in the Tourist Area, Lembang Bandung, Indonesia,” World Journal of English Language, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.5430/wjel.v14n2p230.

[8] N. Napu, “Linguistic landscapes in multilingual urban settings: Insights from translation perspectives,” Studies in English Language and Education, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.24815/siele.v11i1.29559.

[9] B. A. Sudarmanto et al., “Language Preservation through Public Signage: Analyzing the Linguistic Landscape of the Indonesia-Timor Leste Border,” Forum for Linguistic Studies, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 601–612, 2025, doi: 10.30564/fls.v7i4.9052.

[10] Wulandari, K. Khristianto, and A. Arbain, “A linguistics landscape of an Indonesian metropolitan spot: A glimpse over Braga,” Berumpun: International Journal of Social, Politics, and Humanities, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.33019/berumpun.v5i1.93.

[11] Z. Liu, “Liminalising and affectivising cityscape as a branding practice: a sociolinguistic ethnography in urban China,” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, vol. 46, pp. 815–832, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1080/01434632.2023.2215720.

[12] K. Fedorova and H. Nam, “‘Multilingual islands in the monolingual sea’: Foreign languages in the South Korean linguistic landscape,” Open Linguistics, vol. 9, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1515/opli-2022-0238.

[13] A. Fawaid and P. Handayani, “Visualizing inequality: uncovering gender bias in Islamic textbooks of Indonesia,” Cogent Education, vol. 12, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2025.2593342.

[14] R. Assyabani, “Multimodal poetics in digital literature: A corpus-based analysis of visual-verbal design, screen-based textuality, and reader interaction,” Lingua Technica: Journal of Digital Literary Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 41–53, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.64595/cy0q2n14.

[15] A. Fawaid, R. Assyabani, I. Abdullah, C. Muali, M. S. Itqan, and S. Islam, “Human Intelligence and Algorithmic Precision: An Experimental Study of Indonesian Translation Pedagogy in Higher Education,” Asian Journal of University Education, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 779–792, 2025, doi: 10.24191/ajue.v21i3.53.

[16] A. Fawaid, D. P. Arum, and M. Huda, “Othering dan Self-Branding: Subalternitas dan Politik Representasi Indonesia dalam Buku Ajar BIPA,” Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–13, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.30659/jpbi.13.2.1-13.

[17] Fawaid, Who Controls the Narrative? Language, Media, and Politics of Representation. Probolinggo: Pustaka Nurja, 2026.

[18] S. A. Nadifah, “Language, code, and platform-mediated textuality in electronic literature,” Lingua Technica: Journal of Digital Literary Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 28–40, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.64595/80xngp06.

[19] Suaidi, “Reader participation, platform affordances, and interactive meaning-making in online literary environments,” Lingua Technica: Journal of Digital Literary Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 54–66, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.64595/9gy6p728.

[20] J. W. Creswell, Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methode Approach, (Research Design, Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed, Edisi Ketiga) terj. Achmad Fawaid. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://digilib.ub.ac.id/opac/detail-opac?id=139455

[21] A. Fawaid, “Mapping the field of digital literary studies: Concepts, methods, and emerging directions,” Lingua Technica: Journal of Digital Literary Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.64595/99c6t274.

[22] R. Al-Jarf, “English Language Representation in Korean Linguistic Landscapes,” International Journal of Asian and African Studies, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.32996/ijaas.2024.3.2.1.

[23] A. Abdillah, “Environmental Sustainable in Household Waste Management For Urban Resilience: Insight From Makassar City, Indonesia,” Government & Resilience, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.62503/gr.v1i1.2.

[24] F. Jaeka, L. Kurnia, and S. R. Rusdiarti, “Heritage , Memory Politics, and the Production of Postcolonial Identity in Ampenan Old Town, Indonesia,” Space and Culture, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1177/12063312251390288.

[25] Isharyanto, A. Fawaid, and I. Marzuki, “Regulatory Gaps in Protecting Children’s Constitutional Rights against Digital Microtransactions in Indonesia’s Online Gaming Ecosystem,” Khazanah Hukum, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 143–162, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.15575/kh.v8i1.51532.