From diagnosis to doubt: epistemic authority, patient questions, and the pragmatics of medical explanation in Indonesia

Authors

  • Hasanudin Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67490/ijml.v1i3.1047

Keywords:

Diagnostic communication, epistemic authority, medical explanation, patient questions, pragmatics

Abstract

Background: Diagnostic explanation in Indonesian healthcare discourse is shaped by asymmetrical expertise, patient uncertainty, institutional authority, and increasing reliance on public digital health information. Objective: This study examines how epistemic authority is constructed, questioned, and recalibrated through patient questions and medical explanations in Indonesian diagnostic discourse. Method: Using a qualitative corpus-assisted pragmatic design, this study analyzed 35 public Indonesian explanation sequences drawn from patient Q&A texts, verified health education materials, and contextual documents on patient rights, second opinion, medical records, and diagnostic accountability. Results: Diagnostic authority was most visibly organized through expert interpretation, procedural validation, institutional diagnostic pathways, test-mediated evidence, professional redirection, and rights-based accountability. Patient questions functioned not merely as requests for information but as pragmatic acts of clarification, confirmation, risk inquiry, procedural checking, second-opinion comparison, and reassurance seeking. Medical explanations managed uncertainty through terminological simplification, evidential grounding, referral, risk calibration, uncertainty acknowledgement, and legally or institutionally framed accountability. Implication: This study shows that diagnostic trust depends on whether clinical authority remains intelligible, answerable, and reviewable when patients voice doubt. Novelty: This study contributes a pragmatic model for analyzing diagnostic doubt as a structured form of epistemic participation rather than a failure of patient compliance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] N. Laila, "Medical jargon and patient comprehension: A linguistic analysis of informed consent practices in Indonesian hospitals," Indonesian Journal of Medical Linguistics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13-25, 2026.

[2] I. L. Nazulpa, "Doctor-patient communication in rural Indonesia: A pragmatic study of directive speech acts in clinical consultations," Indonesian Journal of Medical Linguistics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2026.

[3] M. Nurtyas, "Language barriers in healthcare delivery: A sociolinguistic case study of multilingual patients in Indonesian urban clinics," Indonesian Journal of Medical Linguistics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 26-38, 2026.

[4] A. S. Nugroho, "Verbal strategies for delivering bad news in oncology settings: A discourse-pragmatic approach," Indonesian Journal of Medical Linguistics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 39-51, 2026.

[5] Y. D. Rusita, "Constructing empathy through language: A linguistic perspective on compassionate communication in mental health services," Indonesian Journal of Medical Linguistics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 67-81, 2026.

[6] S. R. Andayani, "Whose pain is taken seriously? Linguistic credibility, gendered expression, and diagnostic inequality in Indonesian clinical encounters," Indonesian Journal of Medical Linguistics, vol. 1, no. 2, 2026.

[7] M. Shaban, "Can telemedicine hear the patient? Interactional asymmetry, symptom narration, and diagnostic uncertainty in Indonesian virtual consultations," Indonesian Journal of Medical Linguistics, vol. 1, no. 2, 2026.

[8] C. R. Blease, L. Salmi, H. Rexhepi, M. Hägglund, and C. DesRoches, "Patients, clinicians and open notes: Information blocking as a case of epistemic injustice," Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 48, pp. 785-793, 2021.

[9] L. T. Rosen, "Mapping out epistemic justice in the clinical space: Using narrative techniques to affirm patients as knowers," Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, vol. 16, 2021.

[10] R. Goldstein, "Epistemic injustice in the medical context: Introduction to special issue," Social Epistemology, vol. 39, pp. 115-120, 2024.

[11] M. Pot, "Epistemic solidarity in medicine and healthcare," Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, vol. 25, pp. 681-692, 2022.

[12] A. Kerasidou and C. Kerasidou, "Epistemic authority and medical AI: Epistemological differences and challenges in medical practice," Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, vol. 29, pp. 89-95, 2025.

[13] F. Akgün and M. Akgün, "Governing generative AI in healthcare: A normative conceptual framework for epistemic authority, trust, and the architecture of responsibility," Healthcare, vol. 14, 2026.

[14] A. Wolkenstein, "Healthy mistrust: Medical black box algorithms, epistemic authority, and preemptionism," Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, pp. 1-10, 2024.

[15] A. Izadi, "Epistemic engine, deontic driver: Turn-taking as a deontic domain in medical consultations," Discourse & Communication, vol. 20, pp. 239-264, 2026.

[16] B. Ramona, B. Alessia, P. Marina, and R. Ilaria, "Exploring online patient-doctor interactions: An epistemic and pragmatic analysis of Q&A patterns in an Italian “Ask to the doctor” medical forum," Patient Education and Counseling, vol. 134, 2025.

[17] A. Shirokov, "“I read a bit of information”: Epistemic markers as a resource for enacting patients’ agency," Social Science & Medicine, vol. 386, 2025.

[18] F. Funer, "The deception of certainty: How non-interpretable machine learning outcomes challenge the epistemic authority of physicians. A deliberative-relational approach," Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, vol. 25, pp. 167-178, 2022.

[19] J. Durán and K. Jongsma, "Who is afraid of black box algorithms? On the epistemological and ethical basis of trust in medical AI," Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 47, pp. 329-335, 2021.

[20] H. Khani, S. Ahmady, B. Sabet, A. Namaki, S. Zandi, and S. Niakan, "Teaching-learning in clinical education based on epistemological orientations: A multi-method study," PLOS ONE, vol. 18, 2023.

[21] C. S. Percival, L. Maggio, T. Wyatt, and P. C. Martin, "“The program director’s word … it’s stronger than the word of God”: Epistemic injustice revealed through narratives of remediated graduate medical education residents," Medical Education, vol. 58, pp. 848-857, 2023.

[22] V. Luong, R. Ajjawi, S. Burm, R. E. Olson, and A. MacLeod, "Unravelling epistemic injustice in medical education: The case of the underperforming learner," Medical Education, vol. 58, pp. 1286-1295, 2024.

[23] M. Syaifuddin, "Narratives of illness in patient blogs: Exploring personal voices and medical identity in Indonesian digital health discourse," Indonesian Journal of Medical Linguistics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 52-66, 2026.

[24] R. Chapman and H. Carel, "Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life," Journal of Social Philosophy, 2022.

[25] B. Salman and A. Baart, "Epistemic negotiations on a closed psychiatric ward," Philosophical Psychology, vol. 38, pp. 3572-3603, 2024.

[26] C. Okoroji, T. Mackay, D. Robotham, D. Beckford, and V. Pinfold, "Epistemic injustice and mental health research: A pragmatic approach to working with lived experience expertise," Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 14, 2023.

[27] D. I. Petrakaki, P. Chamakiotis, and D. Curto-Millet, "From “making up” professionals to epistemic colonialism: Digital health platforms in the Global South," Social Science & Medicine, vol. 321, 2023.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Hasanudin. (2026). From diagnosis to doubt: epistemic authority, patient questions, and the pragmatics of medical explanation in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Medical Linguistics, 1(3), 208-218. https://doi.org/10.67490/ijml.v1i3.1047

Similar Articles

1-10 of 16

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.