When the project ends: institutional ownership and the long-term sustainability of university–community partnerships in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67490/ijac.v1i2.940Keywords:
community engagement, institutional ownership, monitoring-evaluation, post-disaster recovery, university–community partnershipAbstract
Background: Post-project sustainability remains a persistent problem in university–community partnerships, especially in post-disaster settings such as Candipuro, Lumajang, where BNPB recorded 10,395 displaced persons across 410 evacuation points after the Semeru eruption. Objective: This community engagement program aimed to strengthen institutional ownership among 40 eligible local actors from village institutions, relocation representatives, volunteers, schools, women’s groups, youth representatives, and livelihood groups in Sumbermujur and Sumberwuluh. Method: The method integrated planning, implementation, and monitoring-evaluation through needs assessment, pre-post questionnaires, observation checklists, product rubrics, FGD guides, attendance records, and partner validation forms. Results: During planning, this program conducted three coordination meetings, recorded 42 needs assessment responses, mapped six stakeholder groups, and prepared five evaluation instruments. During implementation, this program delivered one orientation, three core training sessions, eight weeks of mentoring, two peer discussion forums, and recorded 70% practice-output completion. Implication: During monitoring-evaluation, this program recorded 82% attendance, 70% acceptable outputs, a 20-point pre-post capacity score increase, two validation forums, one institutional follow-up plan, and a 3–6 month monitoring agreement. Novelty: The novelty of this program lies in integrating data-based planning, practice-oriented mentoring, participatory validation, and institutional follow-up as a measurable model for sustaining university–community partnerships after project completion.
Downloads
References
[1] Pemerintah Kabupaten Lumajang, “Kecamatan Candipuro,” n.d. [Online]. Available: https://lumajangkab.go.id/kecamatan/candipuro
[2] Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana, “Korban meninggal paska erupsi Semeru bertambah menjadi 51 jiwa,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://bnpb.go.id/berita/korban-meninggal-paska-erupsi-semeru-bertambah-menjadi-51-jiwa
[3] Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana, “Kepala BNPB tinjau huntap dan pendampingan pemulihan pascabencana erupsi Gunung Semeru,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://bnpb.go.id/index.php/berita/kepala-bnpb-tinjau-huntap-dan-pendampingan-pemulihan-pascabencana-erupsi-gunung-semeru
[4] S. Ahmed, A. U. Musawir, and S. Nauman, “Beyond benefits realization: Towards a framework for sustaining and enhancing project benefits,” International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2025, doi: 10.1108/ijmpb-12-2024-0331.
[5] M. N. Caibula, C. Militaru, R. Tamas, C. Dumitrache, and R. Dumitrache, “The particularities of the closing processes of project in the context of sustainability requirements,” Postmodern Openings, 2021, doi: 10.18662/po/12.1/249.
[6] A. MacDonald, A. Clarke, and L. Huang, “Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainability: Designing decision-making processes for partnership capacity,” Journal of Business Ethics, 160, 409–426, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-3885-3.
[7] A. MacDonald, A. Clarke, L. Huang, and M. Seitanidi, “Partner strategic capabilities for capturing value from sustainability-focused multi-stakeholder partnerships,” Sustainability, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11030557.
[8] E. Ordonez-Ponce and A. Clarke, “Sustainability cross-sector partnerships: The strategic role of organizational structures,” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27, 2122–2134, 2020, doi: 10.1002/csr.1952.
[9] J. Mercier, J. Sanders, M. E. Takie, L. Kerr, D. MacNicol, and H. Hall, “From partnership to ownership: Reflections on a community-university research partnership,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24, 2025, doi: 10.1177/16094069251390655.
[10] R. Scholz and G. Steiner, “Process ownership in science–practice collaborations: The special role of transdisciplinary processes in sustainable transitioning,” Sustainability Science, 18, 1501–1518, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11625-023-01291-7.
[11] J. Rogers, “The reparative work of radical collaboration: Project planning to enhance outcomes and long-term sustainability of community partnerships,” Project Management in the Humanities, 3(3), 2023, doi: 10.21428/f1f23564.b3dabf1e.
[12] J. Kivilä, M. Martinsuo, and L. Vuorinen, “Sustainable project management through project control in infrastructure projects,” International Journal of Project Management, 35, 1167–1183, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.009.
[13] M. B. Shaukat, K. F. Latif, A. Sajjad, and G. Eweje, “Revisiting the relationship between sustainable project management and project success: The moderating role of stakeholder engagement and team building,” Sustainable Development, 2021, doi: 10.1002/sd.2228.
[14] S. J. Sonza and A. Protacio, “Voices of the Language Teachers in Teaching Indigenous Students in the IPEd-Implementing Schools,” International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.22161/ijels.102.50.
[15] J. Li, A. Brar, and N. Roihan, “The use of digital technology to enhance language and literacy skills for Indigenous people: A systematic literature review,” p. 100035, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100035.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abu Tholib (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License