Translanguaging under platform capitalism: multilingual identity performances among Indonesian content creators on Youtube

Cindy Eka Aulia

doi:10.67490/ijlc.v1i2.887

Authors

Cindy Eka Aulia Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67490/ijlc.v1i2.887

Keywords:

content creators, multilingual identity, platform capitalism, translanguaging, YouTube

Abstract

Background: Indonesia’s expanding creator economy has transformed YouTube into a commercial arena where multilingual resources mediate communication, identity, visibility, and cultural value across local, national, and transnational audiences. Objective: This study investigates how Indonesian content creators deploy translanguaging to perform multilingual identities while negotiating observable logics of platform capitalism. Method: Using a qualitative digital discourse design, this study integrates translanguaging moment analysis, multimodal discourse analysis, and critical platform analysis across creator videos, transcripts, visual frames, audience responses, platform policies, and publicly visible commercial cues. Results: Findings indicate that lexical insertion, intrasentential movement, regional stylisation, humour, clarification, and audience accommodation constitute prominent communicative resources within Indonesian-dominant discourse. Glocal, cosmopolitan, regional, professional, national, and authentic identities emerge through coordinated relations among language choice, vocal delivery, setting, gesture, editing, subtitles, visual composition, and cultural symbolism. Implication: Multilingual practices also intersect with discoverability framing, engagement prompts, sponsorship integration, audience segmentation, membership promotion, and branded self-presentation, although this study does not infer direct algorithmic causation from these observable correspondences. Novelty: This study contributes a platform-sensitive account of translanguaging by conceptualising multilingual performance as identity labour situated between expressive agency, audience accessibility, cultural authenticity, commercial differentiation, and infrastructural demands for visibility within Indonesia’s increasingly metrics-driven digital cultural economy.

References

[1] R. Afryanti, B. Daud, and K. Muthalib, “A study of code-switching and code-mixing used on YouTube channel: A comparison of Indonesian YouTubers,” English Education Journal, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.24815/eej.v12i3.19166.

[2] M. E. I. Permadi, K. Yusra, Muh. Isnaini, and M. Mahyuni, “Translanguaging in Youtube Channel: A Case Study of Nessie Judge,” JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.54371/jiip.v6i1.1348.

[3] M. Shalihah, “Translanguaging in Social Media: A Case Study of Puri Viera’s Youtube Channel,” International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i01-103.

[4] D. Permatasari, “Village Youtuber in the Perspective of Glocalization,” Semantik: Journal of Social, Media, Communication, and Journalism, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.31958/semantik.v2i1.12074.

[5] K. Tai, “Translanguaging as Inclusive Pedagogical Practices in English-Medium Instruction Science and Mathematics Classrooms for Linguistically and Culturally Diverse Students,” Research in Science Education, vol. 52, pp. 975–1012, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11165-021-10018-6.

[6] W. Ho, “‘Coming here you should speak Chinese’: the multimodal construction of interculturality in YouTube videos,” Language and Intercultural Communication, vol. 22, pp. 662–680, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1080/14708477.2022.2056610.

[7] R. Kusumaningputri, “Negotiating voices in English as a lingua franca: Indonesian multilingual identity in English digital interactions,” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, vol. 45, pp. 4554–4571, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1080/01434632.2023.2173758.

[8] A. Fawaid, Who Controls the Narrative? Language, Media, and Politics of Representation. Probolinggo: Pustaka Nurja, 2026.

[9] D. F. Utami, “Translanguaging practices in Indonesian multilingual classrooms: pedagogical implications for inclusive education,” ijled, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Mar. 2026.

[10] Y. Guo, J. Xiong, and Z. Lin, “Non-identity in practice: translanguaging as a tool for hybrid communication in subtitling communities,” International Journal of Multilingualism, vol. 23, pp. 139–158, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1080/14790718.2025.2538079.

[11] L. Wei, “Transformative pedagogy for inclusion and social justice through translanguaging, co-learning, and transpositioning,” Language Teaching, vol. 57, pp. 203–214, May 2023, doi: 10.1017/s0261444823000186.

[12] M. Mallman, A. Harvey, G. Szalkowicz, and A. Moran, “Campus convivialities: everyday cross-cultural interactions and symbolic boundaries of belonging in higher education,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 1449–1461, 2021, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1685484.

[13] J. A. Ruelas-Mejía, A. Martínez-Borquez, R. Mendoza-Gómez, J. Villanueva-Valle, and E. Mena-Avilés, “Enhancing the Educational Displacement in Early Semester Engineering Students Through Innovative Gamification: A Case Study at Tecnológico de Monterrey, Campus León,” presented at the IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, 2024. doi: 10.1109/EDUCON60312.2024.10578613.

[14] B. Schneider, “Multilingualism and AI: The regimentation of language in the age of digital capitalism,” Signs and Society, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 362–387, 2022, doi: 10.1086/721757.

[15] Bq. L. Sulistiawati, K. Yusra, M. Isnaini, and Arifuddin, “Translanguaging among YouTubers: A Study of Language Use and Identity Construction,” Journal of English Education Forum (JEEF), Dec. 2025, doi: 10.29303/jeef.v5i4.958.

[16] X. Qi et al., “Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2310.03693, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2310.03693.

[17] A. Fawaid, “Mapping the field of digital literary studies: Concepts, methods, and emerging directions,” Lingua Technica: Journal of Digital Literary Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.64595/99c6t274.

[18] L. Gu and X. Gao, “Exploring self-presentation posts of people with depression: themes, stigma, and identity construction,” Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 13, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1558197.

[19] J. Wang and Z. Liang, “Indexical order and language ideology in the linguistic landscape of tourism in Hong Kong: Chungking Mansions and its surroundings,” Chinese Semiotic Studies, vol. 20, pp. 273–295, May 2024, doi: 10.1515/css-2024-2019.

[20] A. Fawaid and P. Handayani, “Visualizing inequality: uncovering gender bias in Islamic textbooks of Indonesia,” Cogent Education, vol. 12, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2025.2593342.

[21] X. Ye et al., “Artificial intelligence in urban science: why does it matter?,” Annals of GIS, vol. 31, pp. 181–189, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1080/19475683.2025.2469110.

[22] G. Kress and T. van Leeuwen, Reading images: The grammar of visual design, 3rd ed. Routledge, 2021.

[23] J. F. Zain, “A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Code Switching in Nessie Judge’s YouTube Videos,” KLAUSA (Kajian Linguistik, Pembelajaran Bahasa, dan Sastra), Jun. 2025, doi: 10.33479/klausa.v9i1.1197.

[24] N. H. Mazlan, C. Rahma, W. Putra, and H. Sulistyo, “Understanding reader navigation patterns in multi-path hypertext fiction: A case study approach to Patchwork Girl,” Lingua Technica: Journal of Digital Literary Studies, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.64595/lingtech.v1i1.3.

[25] B. E. Duffy, T. Poell, and D. B. Nieborg, “Platform Practices in the Cultural Industries: Creativity, Labor, and Citizenship,” Social Media and Society, vol. 5, no. 4, 2019, doi: 10.1177/2056305119879672.

[26] J. Van Dijck, T. Poell, and M. de Waal, The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press, 2018.

[27] J. Uhl, S. Leyk, Y.-Y. Chiang, W. Duan, and C. Knoblock, “Automated Extraction of Human Settlement Patterns From Historical Topographic Map Series Using Weakly Supervised Convolutional Neural Networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 6978–6996, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1109/access.2019.2963213.

[28] B. Duffy and C. Meisner, “Platform governance at the margins: Social media creators’ experiences with algorithmic (in)visibility,” Media, Culture & Society, vol. 45, pp. 285–304, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1177/01634437221111923.

[29] J. Joseph, “Algorithmic bias in public health AI: a silent threat to equity in low-resource settings,” Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 13, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1643180.

[30] R. N. Alfin, F. X. A. Setiawan, E. Sudiarti, and J. Jalianery, “Legal Protection of Public Image Rights Figures against the Use of Deepfakes in Commercial Advertising Based on Artificial Intelligence,” Jurnal Impresi Indonesia, May 2026, doi: 10.58344/jii.v5i5.7782.

[31] R. Al-Jarf, “English Language Representation in Korean Linguistic Landscapes,” International Journal of Asian and African Studies, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.32996/ijaas.2024.3.2.1.

[32] S. Lee, C. Lee, J. W. Nam, A. V. Moudon, and J. Mendoza, “Street environments and crime around low-income and minority schools: Adopting an environmental audit tool to assess crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED).,” Landscape and urban planning, vol. 232, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104676.

[33] Y. Qu and J. Wang, “Performance and biases of Large Language Models in public opinion simulation,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 11, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-03609-x.

[34] R. Ali et al., “Bridging the literacy gap for surgical consents: an AI-human expert collaborative approach,” NPJ Digital Medicine, vol. 7, May 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01039-2.

[35] E. Bulut, “Globally connected, nationally restrained: Platform ambiguities and censorship in Turkey’s drama production,” International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 99–115, 2025, doi: 10.1177/13678779241254541.