From moderation to marginalization: language, power, and content governance on Indonesian social media platforms

Reza Pahlawan

doi:10.67490/ijlc.v1i2.889

Authors

Reza Pahlawan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67490/ijlc.v1i2.889

Keywords:

content governance, linguistic marginalization, platform power, social media, transparency

Abstract

Background: Content moderation increasingly governs linguistic visibility, public participation, and institutional authority across Indonesia’s multilingual social-media environment, where standardized harm categories may inadequately recognize contextual, regional, and identity-based expression. Objective: This study examines how regulatory language, platform policies, enforcement procedures, and civil-society critiques configure relationships among language, power, and marginalization in Indonesian content governance. Method: Using a qualitative corpus-assisted design, this study analyses 26 verified public documents from 2020–2026, integrating official regulations, platform standards, enforcement communications, civil-society assessments, and comparative governance materials across Indonesian public digital communication ecosystems, through critical policy discourse analysis, moderation-process mapping, and multimodal governance analysis. Results: Findings show that harm definition and contextual classification dominate governance discourse, while linguistic accessibility and culturally situated interpretation receive comparatively limited institutional attention. Enforcement documents prioritize automated detection, takedown, and compliance, whereas explanations, appeal mechanisms, and unequal consequences remain less systematically articulated. Implication: Civil-society and international materials consequently reposition transparency, proportionality, participation, localization, and independent review as necessary correctives to concentrated state-platform authority. Novelty: This study contributes an integrated account of moderation as a distributive governance system, demonstrating that marginalization may emerge not solely from content removal but from institutional asymmetries between classificatory power, visibility control, contextual competence, and users’ capacity to understand and contest decisions.

References

[1] M. O. Ibrohim and I. Budi, “Hate speech and abusive language detection in Indonesian social media: Progress and challenges,” Heliyon, vol. 9, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18647.

[2] Y. Mubarok, D. Sudana, D. Yanti, Sugiyo, A. Aisyah, and A. N. Af’idah, “Abusive Comments (Hate Speech) on Indonesian Social Media: A Forensic Linguistics Approach,” Theory and Practice in Language Studies, May 2024, doi: 10.17507/tpls.1405.16.

[3] V. Gongane, M. Munot, and A. Anuse, “Detection and moderation of detrimental content on social media platforms: current status and future directions,” Social Network Analysis and Mining, vol. 12, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s13278-022-00951-3.

[4] A. Fawaid, “Mapping the field of digital literary studies: Concepts, methods, and emerging directions,” Lingua Technica: Journal of Digital Literary Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.64595/99c6t274.

[5] M. Singhal, C. Ling, N. Kumarswamy, G. Stringhini, and S. Nilizadeh, “SoK: Content Moderation in Social Media, from Guidelines to Enforcement, and Research to Practice,” 2023 IEEE 8th European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P), pp. 868–895, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1109/eurosp57164.2023.00056.

[6] R. Griffin, “Rethinking rights in social media governance: human rights, ideology and inequality,” European Law Open, vol. 2, pp. 30–56, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1017/elo.2023.7.

[7] D. Liu, “The Balancing Acts: Communicating Legitimacy in Global Speech Governance,” Social Media + Society, vol. 11, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1177/20563051251340855.

[8] O. Haimson, D. Delmonaco, P. Nie, and A. Wegner, “Disproportionate Removals and Differing Content Moderation Experiences for Conservative, Transgender, and Black Social Media Users: Marginalization and Moderation Gray Areas,” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 5, pp. 1–35, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1145/3479610.

[9] B. Duffy and C. Meisner, “Platform governance at the margins: Social media creators’ experiences with algorithmic (in)visibility,” Media, Culture & Society, vol. 45, pp. 285–304, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1177/01634437221111923.

[10] Y. Lyu, J. Cai, A. Callis, K. Cotter, and J. Carroll, “‘I Got Flagged for Supposed Bullying, Even Though It Was in Response to Someone Harassing Me About My Disability.’: A Study of Blind TikTokers’ Content Moderation Experiences,” presented at the Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Jan. 2024. doi: 10.1145/3613904.3642148.

[11] S. Mayworm, M. Devito, D. Delmonaco, H. Thach, and O. Haimson, “Content Moderation Folk Theories and Perceptions of Platform Spirit among Marginalized Social Media Users,” ACM Transactions on Social Computing, vol. 7, pp. 1–27, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1145/3632741.

[12] H. Thach, S. Mayworm, D. Delmonaco, and O. Haimson, “(In)visible moderation: A digital ethnography of marginalized users and content moderation on Twitch and Reddit,” New Media & Society, vol. 26, pp. 4034–4055, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1177/14614448221109804.

[13] A. ManishKumar and S. Gupta, “Governance of Social Media Platforms: A Literature Review,” Pac. Asia J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 15, p. 3, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.17705/1pais.15103.

[14] D. Endres, L. Hedler, and K. Wodajo, “Bias in Social Media Content Management: What Do Human Rights Have to Do with It?,” AJIL Unbound, vol. 117, pp. 139–144, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1017/aju.2023.23.

[15] S. Jhaver, A. Q. Zhang, Q. Z. Chen, N. Natarajan, R. Wang, and A. Zhang, “Personalizing Content Moderation on Social Media: User Perspectives on Moderation Choices, Interface Design, and Labor,” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 7, pp. 1–33, May 2023, doi: 10.1145/3610080.

[16] L. Madio and M. Quinn, “Content Moderation and Advertising in Social Media Platforms,” SSRN Electronic Journal, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4875546.

[17] S. J. Kartutu and U. Rusadi, “Social Media as a New Arena of Power in Indonesia: A Political Economy Perspective in the Digital Platform Era,” International Journal of Social and Human, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.59613/0pscjk39.

[18] B. Sander, “Democratic Disruption in the Age of Social Media: Between Marketized and Structural Conceptions of Human Rights Law,” European Journal of International Law, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1093/ejil/chab022.

[19] T. Divon, C. Are, and P. Briggs, “Platform gaslighting: A user-centric insight into social media corporate communications of content moderation,” Platforms & Society, vol. 2, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1177/29768624241303109.

[20] D. Oh and J. Downey, “Does algorithmic content moderation promote democratic discourse? Radical democratic critique of toxic language AI,” Information, Communication & Society, vol. 28, pp. 1157–1176, May 2024, doi: 10.1080/1369118x.2024.2346531.

[21] R. Rogers, “Marginalizing the Mainstream: How Social Media Privilege Political Information,” Frontiers in Big Data, vol. 4, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.3389/fdata.2021.689036.

[22] A. Heldt and S. Dreyer, “Competent Third Parties and Content Moderation on Platforms: Potentials of Independent Decision-Making Bodies From A Governance Structure Perspective,” Journal of Information Policy, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.5325/jinfopoli.11.2021.0266.

[23] R. A. Wismashanti, “Social Media Content Moderation Challenges for Vulnerable Groups: A Case Study on Tiktok Indonesia,” Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.59188/eduvest.v3i8.893.

[24] P. Pujiati, A. Lundeto, and I. Trianto, “Representing Arab-Indonesian identity: Language and cultural narratives on social media,” Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.17509/ijal.v14i3.78286.

[25] C. Peterson-Salahuddin, “Repairing the harm: Toward an algorithmic reparations approach to hate speech content moderation,” Big Data & Society, vol. 11, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1177/20539517241245333.

[26] S. Mayworm et al., “The Online Identity Help Center: Designing and Developing a Content Moderation Policy Resource for Marginalized Social Media Users,” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 8, pp. 1–30, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1145/3637406.