Human or machine? discursive constructions of authenticity in AI-generated news and public communication in Indonesia

Dewi Masyithoh

doi:10.67490/ijlc.v1i2.886

Authors

Dewi Masyithoh Universitas Nurul Jadid Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67490/ijlc.v1i2.886

Keywords:

accountability, artificial intelligence, authenticity, journalism, public communication

Abstract

Background: Generative artificial intelligence is reshaping news production and public communication by complicating established relations among authorship, credibility, transparency, and institutional responsibility. Objective: This study investigates how Indonesian governmental, regulatory, and media institutions discursively construct authenticity in documents concerning AI-assisted journalism and public communication. Method: Using a qualitative corpus-assisted design, this study analyses fifteen public documents published between 2023 and 2026 through Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis, van Leeuwen’s social-actor framework, and multimodal discourse analysis, with metadata, textual evidence, and coding stored in linked datasets. Results: Findings show that authenticity is constructed primarily through institutional authority, human verification, source traceability, ethical disclosure, and professional accountability. Human-centred authenticity dominates journalism-related documents, whereas public-communication texts more frequently combine innovation, partnership, official-data authorization, and risk framing. AI is widely granted productive agency as a tool, collaborator, presenter, or intermediary, but responsibility remains assigned to journalists, media organizations, government institutions, and platform operators. Implication: Contextual variation further indicates that news discourse protects epistemic authority, while governmental communication more readily legitimizes AI as an administrative resource. Novelty: This study contributes a relational model of authenticity that moves beyond binary human–machine authorship by integrating discursive legitimation, distributed agency, institutional context, and multimodal representation within an Indonesian communication setting amid rapid technological institutional change.

References

[1] H. Cools and M. Koliska, “News automation and algorithmic transparency in the newsroom: The case of The Washington Post,” Journalism Studies, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 662–680, 2024, doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2024.2326636.

[2] A. van Dalen, “Revisiting the algorithms behind the headlines: How journalists respond to professional competition of generative AI,” Journalism Practice, 2024, doi: 10.1080/17512786.2024.2389209.

[3] L. Amigo and C. Porlezza, “Journalism will always need journalists: The perceived impact of AI on journalism authority in Switzerland,” Journalism Practice, vol. 19, pp. 2266–2284, 2025, doi: 10.1080/17512786.2025.2487534.

[4] A. Sietsma et al., “Machine learning evidence map reveals global differences in adaptation action,” One Earth, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.12.011.

[5] A. Nanz, A. Binder, and J. Matthes, “AI in the newsroom: Does the public trust automated journalism and will they pay for it?,” Journalism Studies, vol. 26, no. 14, pp. 1745–1764, 2025, doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2025.2547301.

[6] A. Fawaid, H. Baharun, M. Hamzah, Rohimah, I. Munawwaroh, and D. F. Putri, “AI-based career management to improve the quality of decision making in higher education,” in 2025 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), IEEE, Mar. 2025, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/isec64801.2025.11147274.

[7] A. Fawaid, I. Abdullah, H. Baharun, S. Aimah, R. Faishol, and N. Hidayati, “The Role of Online Game Simulation Based Interactive Textbooks to Reduce at-Risk Students’ Anxiety in Indonesian Language Subject,” in 2024 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA), IEEE, Dec. 2024, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1109/dasa63652.2024.10836301.

[8] T. J. Thomson, R. J. Thomas, and P. Matich, “Generative visual AI in news organizations: Challenges, opportunities, perceptions, and policies,” Digital Journalism, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1693–1714, 2025, doi: 10.1080/21670811.2024.2331769.

[9] A. Misri, “There’s a rule book in my head: Journalism ethics meet artificial intelligence,” Digital Journalism, 2025, doi: 10.1080/21670811.2025.2495693.

[10] A. Fawaid and P. Handayani, “Visualizing inequality: uncovering gender bias in Islamic textbooks of Indonesia,” Cogent Education, vol. 12, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2025.2593342.

[11] Y. Wang, “Artificial Intelligence Technologies in College English Translation Teaching,” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol. 53, pp. 1–20, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10936-023-09960-5.

[12] A. Fawaid, R. Assyabani, I. Abdullah, C. Muali, M. S. Itqan, and S. Islam, “Human Intelligence and Algorithmic Precision: An Experimental Study of Indonesian Translation Pedagogy in Higher Education,” Asian Journal of University Education, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 779–792, 2025, doi: 10.24191/ajue.v21i3.53.

[13] A. Taeihagh, “Governance of generative AI,” Policy and Society, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2025, doi: 10.1093/polsoc/puaf001.

[14] M. Dehnert and P. A. Mongeau, “Persuasion in the age of artificial intelligence (AI): Theories and complications of AI-based persuasion,” Human Communication Research, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 386–403, 2022, doi: 10.1093/hcr/hqac006.

[15] I. Amerini et al., “Deepfake Media Forensics: Status and Future Challenges,” Journal of Imaging, vol. 11, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.3390/jimaging11030073.

[16] B. Simon, “A Social Psychological Approach to Tolerance: The Disapproval-Respect Model1,” in Tolerance and Intolerance in Religion and Beyond: Challenges from the Past and in the Present, 2023, pp. 22–34. doi: 10.4324/9781003082484-3.

[17] E. Durmus et al., “Towards Measuring the Representation of Subjective Global Opinions in Language Models,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2306.16388, Jun. 2023, [Online]. Available: https://consensus.app/papers/towards-measuring-the-representation-of-subjective-durmus-nyugen/2121e005f8e956e0bd9162ffe7f9e513/

[18] L. A. Møller, A. van Dalen, and M. Skovsgaard, “A little of that human touch: How regular journalists redefine their expertise in the face of artificial intelligence,” Journalism Studies, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 84–100, 2025, doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2024.2412212.

[19] A. Y. Liu, “Ephemeral visibility and externally visible production: How algorithmic automation accelerates fans’ data work,” New Media and Society, 2025, doi: 10.1177/14614448251393480.

[20] P. Matich, T. J. Thomson, and R. J. Thomas, “Old threats, new name? Generative AI and visual journalism,” Journalism Practice, 2025, doi: 10.1080/17512786.2025.2451677.

[21] H. Cools and N. Diakopoulos, “Uses of generative AI in the newsroom: Mapping journalists’ perceptions of perils and possibilities,” Journalism Practice, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 878–896, 2026, doi: 10.1080/17512786.2024.2394558.

[22] M. Chan, “Studying Social Media and Journalism with Publicly Available Cross-national Secondary Data,” in Research Methods for Social Media Journalism, 2025, pp. 164–177. doi: 10.4324/9781003568766-16.

[23] A. Fawaid, “Mapping the field of digital literary studies: Concepts, methods, and emerging directions,” Lingua Technica: Journal of Digital Literary Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.64595/99c6t274.

[24] E. Groenewald, “A student’s journey in South African higher education: Positioning and repositioning within a new space,” Issues in Educational Research, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 591–607, 2023.

[25] J. A. Lischka, “National conditions for AI innovation in journalism: How innovation capacity, media systems, and professional roles predict AI award recognition across 25 countries,” Journal of Media Economics, 2025, doi: 10.1080/08997764.2025.2566700.