Medical jargon and patient comprehension: a linguistic analysis of informed consent practices in Indonesian hospitals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67490/ijml.v1i1.537Keywords:
autonomy, discourse analysis, health literacy, informed consent, medical jargonAbstract
Background: Informed consent remains a central ethical requirement in healthcare, yet disparities in health literacy and institutional medical language continue to challenge genuine patient comprehension in Indonesian hospitals. Objective: This study aims to examine how medical jargon, discursive authority, and pragmatic interactional patterns shape patient understanding within written and spoken informed consent practices. Method: Using a qualitative-dominant mixed-method design, this research analyzes 45 consent documents, 26 recorded consultations, and 20 patient interviews through lexical density and readability metrics, Critical Discourse Analysis, and pragmatic repair theory. Results: The findings reveal consistently high lexical density and low readability levels exceeding patients’ educational profiles. Discursive patterns demonstrate systematic de-agentivization and risk transfer framing through passive constructions and legal register. Interactional analysis further shows doctor-dominated turn-taking, frequent closed confirmation checks, and limited patient-initiated repair, correlating with measurable comprehension gaps. Implication: These findings imply that improving informed consent in Indonesian healthcare requires not only simplifying language but also restructuring communicative practices to enhance patient agency, comprehension, and ethical participation. Novelty: The novelty of this study lies in integrating corpus-based computational metrics with critical and pragmatic discourse analysis to conceptualize informed consent as a multi-layered discursive ecosystem rather than a purely legal or ethical instrument.
Downloads
References
[1] E. Gourlay et al., “Readability and complexity of written information presented to hospitalised patients for trial consent during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a retrospective document analysis,” BMJ Open, vol. 15, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089447.
[2] L. O’Sullivan, P. Sukumar, R. Crowley, E. McAuliffe, and P. Doran, “Readability and understandability of clinical research patient information leaflets and consent forms in Ireland and the UK: a retrospective quantitative analysis,” BMJ Open, vol. 10, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037994.
[3] Ö. Ekici and F. Mahfozi, “ASSESSMENT OF THE READABILITY OF INFORMED CONSENT FORMS USED IN AN ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY CLINIC,” Journal of International Dental Sciences, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.21306/dishekimligi.1600348.
[4] E. Emanuel and C. Boyle, “Assessment of Length and Readability of Informed Consent Documents for COVID-19 Vaccine Trials,” JAMA Network Open, vol. 4, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10843.
[5] İ. Uzun, “Readability Challenges in Ophthalmology Consent Forms: A Comprehensive Assessment Using the Ateşman Formula,” OSMANGAZİ JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.20515/otd.1740658.
[6] T. Isaacs, J. Murdoch, Z. Demjén, and F. Stevenson, “Examining the language demands of informed consent documents in patient recruitment to cancer trials using tools from corpus and computational linguistics,” Health (London, England : 1997), vol. 26, pp. 431–456, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1177/1363459320963431.
[7] W. Kusumastuti, E. Yunila, and S. P. Arso, “Legal Review of Informed Consent: Role and Implementation Challenges in Improving Hospital Health Services in Indonesia,” BIO Web of Conferences, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1051/bioconf/202519300027.
[8] C. Wahyuni, B. Laskarwati, and N. M. A. Qulub, “Informed Consent in Health Services: How are the Patients’ Rights Protected?,” Journal of Law and Legal Reform, vol. 1, pp. 591–604, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.15294/jllr.v1i4.39891.
[9] A. P. Kristiawan, “KEDUDUKAN HUKUM INFORMED CONSENT DALAM PEMENUHAN HAK PASIEN DI RUMAH SAKIT,” vol. 19, pp. 1–15, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.36356/hdm.v19i1.2161.
[10] R. Ali et al., “Bridging the literacy gap for surgical consents: an AI-human expert collaborative approach,” NPJ Digital Medicine, vol. 7, May 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01039-2.
[11] D. Zhang et al., “Compromised informed consent due to functional health literacy challenges in Chinese hospitals,” BMC Medical Ethics, vol. 25, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01089-x.
[12] A. Burks and J. Keim-Malpass, “Health literacy and informed consent for clinical trials: a systematic review and implications for nurses,” Nursing: Research and Reviews, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.2147/nrr.s207497.
[13] I. Ng, “Informed consent in clinical practice: Old problems, new challenges,” Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, vol. 54, pp. 153–158, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1177/14782715241247087.
[14] E. Bär et al., “Limitations of informed consent in routine clinical practice - An observational survey study to characterize patient populations with limited understanding of the routine informed consent process in an anaesthesia clinic,” BMC Anesthesiology, vol. 25, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03275-9.
[15] F. Sitepu, I. Isnaini, and M. Akmal, “Implementation of Informed Consent at Bandung Hospital, Medan City,” Journal of Public Representative and Society Provision, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.55885/jprsp.v5i2.526.
[16] T. S. Subu, M. Isrul, A. R. Syaban, N. Noviati, and L. Hadju, “Addressing Legal Uncertainty in Delayed Informed Consent: Protecting Health Workers in Indonesian Hospitals,” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.24090/volksgeist.v8i2.13089.
[17] A. Sosiawan, V. R. Sushanty, D. Wahjuningrum, and F. Setiawan, “A case study of informed consent in Indonesian Law Number 29, 2004,” Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi), Jan. 2023, doi: 10.20473/j.djmkg.v56.i1.p1-6.
[18] J. Glaser et al., “Interventions to Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent for Medical and Surgical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review,” Medical Decision Making, vol. 40, pp. 119–143, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1177/0272989x19896348.
[19] S. Chinn, A. Hasell, and D. Hiaeshutter-Rice, “Mapping Digital Wellness Content: Implications for Health, Science, and Political Communication Research,” JQD, vol. 3, pp. 1–56, May 2023, doi: 10.51685/jqd.2023.009.
[20] A. Alamgir, P. Roy, and F. Taverna, “Levels of Engagement of South Asian Participants in Health Research: Effectiveness of Community-Based Research (CBR) Framework,” Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i92415.
[21] L. Chan, P. McGarey, and J. A. Sclafani, “Using Large Data Sets for Population-Based Health Research,” in Principles and Practice of Clinical Research, 2018, pp. 293–302. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-849905-4.00020-4.
[22] T. Pietrzykowski and K. Śmiłowska, “The reality of informed consent: empirical studies on patient comprehension—systematic review,” Trials, vol. 22, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04969-w.
[23] N. Fairclough, Media discourse. Edward Arnold London, 1995. [Online]. Available: https://reviewbooku.com/review/norman-fairclough-media-discourse-4951969
[24] I. Feinberg, A. Gajra, L. Hetherington, and K. McCarthy, “Simplifying informed consent as a universal precaution,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64139-9.
[25] K. Venkatraman and A. Manoharan, “Public Engagement as the Fifth Dimension of Outbreak Communication: Public’s Perceptions of Public Health Communication during COVID-19 in India,” Health Communication, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 285–297, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1950294.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Naridatul Laila (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License