From radiology report to patient narrative: comparing expert- and AI-generated simplifications of Indonesian medical information
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67490/ijml.v1i2.946Keywords:
artificial intelligence, health literacy, Indonesian medical discourse, patient narrative, radiology report simplificationAbstract
Background: Radiology reports increasingly enter patient-facing digital health environments, yet their technical vocabulary, compressed syntax, and implicit diagnostic reasoning often exceed lay comprehension, particularly in multilingual Indonesian healthcare contexts. Objective: This study aims to compare how expert- and AI-generated simplifications transform Indonesian radiology-related information into patient narratives across readability, semantic fidelity, and narrative-pragmatic alignment. Method: A comparative qualitative-dominant corpus design was applied to 68 coded meaning units derived from 17 publicly verifiable radiology-related documents, with paired expert and AI simplifications analysed through health-literacy, clinical-risk, and patient-centred discourse matrices. Results: Findings show that AI-generated simplifications more frequently improved lexical accessibility, direct patient address, explanatory sequencing, orientation sentences, and actionable guidance. Expert-generated simplifications more consistently preserved uncertainty, diagnostic caution, warning, proportional reassurance, and source-bound clinical meaning. Implication: Results further indicate that readability gains and patient-centred voice do not automatically guarantee semantic accountability, because fluent AI explanations may introduce unsupported additions, softened risk, or overconfident reformulation. Novelty: This study contributes a triadic framework for evaluating medical simplification as readability transformation, semantic fidelity, and narrative-pragmatic alignment rather than as plain-language rewriting alone.
Downloads
References
[1] K. S. Amin, P. Khosla, R. H. Doshi, S. Chheang, and H. P. Forman, “Artificial intelligence to improve patient understanding of radiology reports,” The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 96, 407–417, 2023, doi: 10.59249/nkoy5498.
[2] K. Jeblick, B. Schachtner, J. Dexl, A. Mittermeier, A. Stüber, J. Topalis, et al., “ChatGPT makes medicine easy to swallow: An exploratory case study on simplified radiology reports,” European Radiology, 34, 2817–2825, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10213-1.
[3] Q. Lyu, J. Tan, M. Zapadka, J. Ponnatapura, C. Niu, K. J. Myers, G. Wang, and C. Whitlow, “Translating radiology reports into plain language using ChatGPT and GPT-4 with prompt learning: Results, limitations, and potential,” Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art, 6, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s42492-023-00136-5.
[4] C. C. Tang, S. Nagesh, D. A. Fussell, J. Glavis-Bloom, N. Mishra, C. Li, et al., “Generating colloquial radiology reports with large language models,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2024, doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae223.
[5] M. Tepe and E. Emekli, “Decoding medical jargon: The use of AI language models (ChatGPT-4, BARD, Microsoft Copilot) in radiology reports,” Patient Education and Counseling, 126, 108307, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108307.
[6] A. Bozer and Y. Pekçevik, “Comparative evaluation of large language models in explaining radiology reports: Expert assessment of readability, understandability, and communication features,” Insights into Imaging, 16, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s13244-025-02121-3.
[7] F. Van Der Mee, R. Ottenheijm, E. Gentry, J. Nobel, F. Zijta, J. Cals, and J. Jansen, “The impact of different radiology report formats on patient information processing: A systematic review,” European Radiology, 35, 2644–2657, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11165-w.
[8] N. Laila, “Medical jargon and patient comprehension: A linguistic analysis of informed consent practices in Indonesian hospitals,” Indonesian Journal of Medical Linguistics, 1(1), 13–25, 2026.
[9] M. Nurtyas, “Language barriers in healthcare delivery: A sociolinguistic case study of multilingual patients in Indonesian urban clinics,” Indonesian Journal of Medical Linguistics, 1(1), 26–38, 2026.
[10] Y. D. Rusita, “Constructing empathy through language: A linguistic perspective on compassionate communication in mental health services,” Indonesian Journal of Medical Linguistics, 1(1), 67–81, 2026.
[11] M. Syaifuddin, “Narratives of illness in patient blogs: Exploring personal voices and medical identity in Indonesian digital health discourse,” Indonesian Journal of Medical Linguistics, 1(1), 52–66, 2026.
[12] H. Lee, S.-H. Song, C. Park, J. Seo, W. H. Kim, J. Kim, et al., “The ethics of simplification: Balancing patient autonomy, comprehension, and accuracy in AI-generated radiology reports,” BMC Medical Ethics, 26, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01285-3.
[13] A. Pal, T. Wangmo, T. Bharadia, M. Ahmed-Richards, M. Bhanderi, R. Kachhadiya, S. Allemann, and B. Elger, “Generative AI/LLMs for plain language medical information for patients, caregivers and general public: Opportunities, risks and ethics,” Patient Preference and Adherence, 19, 2227–2249, 2025, doi: 10.2147/PPA.S527922.
[14] S. Aydin, M. Karabacak, V. Vlachos, and K. Margetis, “Large language models in patient education: A scoping review of applications in medicine,” Frontiers in Medicine, 11, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1477898.
[15] M. Nasra, R. Jaffri, D. Pavlin-Premrl, H. Kok, A. Khabaza, C. Barras, et al., “Can artificial intelligence improve patient educational material readability? A systematic review and narrative synthesis,” Internal Medicine Journal, 55, 2024, doi: 10.1111/imj.16607.
[16] A. Sunshine, G. H. Honce, A. Callen, D. Zander, J. L. Tanabe, S. P. L. Petrucci, C.-T. Lin, and J. Honce, “Evaluating the quality and understandability of radiology report summaries generated by ChatGPT: Survey study,” JMIR Formative Research, 9, 2025, doi: 10.2196/76097.
[17] I. L. Nazulpa, “Doctor–patient communication in rural Indonesia: A pragmatic study of directive speech acts in clinical consultations,” Indonesian Journal of Medical Linguistics, 1(1), 1–12, 2026.
[18] R. H. Doshi, K. S. Amin, P. Khosla, S. Bajaj, S. Chheang, and H. P. Forman, “Quantitative evaluation of large language models to streamline radiology report impressions: A multimodal retrospective analysis,” Radiology, 310(3), e231593, 2024, doi: 10.1148/radiol.231593.
[19] H. Li, J. Moon, D. Iyer, P. Balthazar, E. A. Krupinski, Z. Bercu, et al., “Decoding radiology reports: Potential application of OpenAI ChatGPT to enhance patient understanding of diagnostic reports,” Clinical Imaging, 101, 137–141, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.06.008.
[20] P. K. Sarangi, A. Lumbani, M. Swarup, S. Panda, S. S. Sahoo, P. Hui, et al., “Assessing ChatGPT’s proficiency in simplifying radiological reports for healthcare professionals and patients,” Cureus, 15, 2023, doi: 10.7759/cureus.50881.
[21] L. Alam and S. T. Mueller, “Examining the effect of explanation on satisfaction and trust in AI diagnostic systems,” BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01542-6.
[22] R. Larasati, A. De Liddo, and E. Motta, “Meaningful explanation effect on user’s trust in an AI medical system: Designing explanations for non-expert users,” ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 13, 1–39, 2023, doi: 10.1145/3631614.
[23] Z. Zhang, Y. Genc, D. Wang, M. Ahsen, and X. Fan, “Effect of AI explanations on human perceptions of patient-facing AI-powered healthcare systems,” Journal of Medical Systems, 45, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10916-021-01743-6.
[24] A. Tariq, S. Trivedi, A. Urooj, G. Ramasamy, S. Fathizadeh, M. T. Stib, et al., “Patient-centric summarization of radiology findings using two-step training of large language models,” ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare, 6, 1–15, 2024, doi: 10.1145/3709154.
[25] M. V. Van Driel, N. Blok, J. A. J. G. Van Den Brand, D. Van De Sande, M. De Vries, B. Eijlers, et al., “Leveraging GPT-4 enables patient comprehension of radiology reports,” European Journal of Radiology, 187, 112111, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112111.
[26] R. Maroncelli, V. Rizzo, M. Pasculli, F. Cicciarelli, M. Macera, F. Galati, C. Catalano, and F. Pediconi, “Probing clarity: AI-generated simplified breast imaging reports for enhanced patient comprehension powered by ChatGPT-4o,” European Radiology Experimental, 8, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s41747-024-00526-1.
[27] A. S. Nugroho, “Verbal strategies for delivering bad news in oncology settings: A discourse-pragmatic approach,” Indonesian Journal of Medical Linguistics, 1(1), 39–51, 2026.
[28] K. E. Nitsch and S. J. Ivatury, “Do people prefer AI-generated patient educational materials over traditional ones?,” Patient Education and Counseling, 134, 108672, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2025.108672.
[29] P. Gondode, S. Duggal, N. Garg, S. Sethupathy, O. Asai, and P. Lohakare, “Comparing patient education tools for chronic pain medications: Artificial intelligence chatbot versus traditional patient information leaflets,” Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 68, 631–636, 2024, doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_204_24.
[30] P. Prucker, K. Bressem, J. C. Peeken, M. Jukic, A. Marka, M. Strenzke, et al., “A prospective controlled trial of large language model-based simplification of oncologic CT reports for patients with cancer,” Radiology, 317(2), e251844, 2025, doi: 10.1148/radiol.251844.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ica Maulina Rifkiyatul Islami (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License